<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="LinkedIn" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=1310905&amp;fmt=gif">


Explore CloudZero

Overview Icon

Discover the power of cloud cost intelligence.

Services Icon

Give engineering a cloud cost coach.

Pricing Icon

Learn more about CloudZero's pricing.

Demo Icon

Request a demo to see CloudZero in action.

About Icon

Learn more about CloudZero and who we are.

Connect With Us

Got questions? We have answers.

Questions Icon

Speak with our Cloud Cost Analysts and get the answers you need.

Get in touch arrow-right


How SeatGeek Decoded Its AWS Bill and Measured Cost Per Customer

Read customer story arrow-right
User Icon

By Role


Enable engineering to make cost-aware development decisions.


Give finance the context they need to make informed decisions.


Decentralize cloud cost and mature your FinOps program.

Use Case Icon

By Use Case

Provider Icon

By Provider

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Measure, monitor, and optimize cloud spend on AWS.


Combine cloud cost intelligence from AWS and Snowflake.

Resources Icon



Discover the best cloud cost optimization content in the industry.

Content Library

Browse helpful webinars, ebooks, and other useful resources.

Case Studies

Learn how we’ve helped happy customers like SeatGeek, Drift, Remitly, and more.


5 Tactical Ways To Align Engineering And Finance On Cloud Spend

Read blog post arrow-right

Single-Tenant Vs. Multi-Tenant Cloud: Which Should You Use?

Understand the differences between single-tenant versus multi-tenant cloud architecture so you can build cost-effective applications.

Is your current cloud cost tool giving you the cost intelligence you need?  Most tools are manual, clunky, and inexact. Discover how CloudZero takes a new  approach to organizing your cloud spend.Click here to learn more.

When operating in the cloud, one of the key decisions to make is about which type of architecture to adopt for your business and customer data. This is because choosing cost-effective architecture is key to building profitable SaaS software.

Single-tenant and multi-tenant cloud environments are the options to consider. Both types of architecture have security and privacy implications. There’s also the issue of cost, which differs significantly depending on the architecting model you adopt.

In this article, we’ll compare multi-tenant vs. single-tenant cloud architecture and how to build more cost-effective applications irrespective of the model you operate.

Defining Multi-Tenant Vs. Single-Tenant Cloud Architecture

What is a multi-tenant application vs. single tenant?

Single-tenant cloud architecture is one where a single software instance and its supporting infrastructure/database serve only one customer. In a single-tenant environment, all customer data and interactions are separate from every other customer. Customer data is not housed in the same database and there’s no sharing of data in any way.

A multi-tenant architecture is one where a single software instance and database serves multiple customers (i.e. tenants).

The real estate analogy is often used to explain single-tenant vs. multi-tenant cloud architecture. In a single-tenant cloud, each customer lives alone in a single apartment building which has its own security system and facilities and is completely isolated from neighboring buildings.

In multi-tenant cloud architecture, tenants live in different apartments inside a single apartment building. They share the same security system and communal facilities. But each tenant has a key to their respective apartments so their privacy is guaranteed within their apartment. However, the activities of fellow tenants are more likely to have an impact on their comfort in the building.

Most startups opt for a multi-tenant setup, which means having one big database that houses all the customer data. With the right security systems in place, customer data stays private. While customers cannot see each other’s data, they do live in the same database, and the same computer processes all of the data; so, it’s not segmented in any way.

Benefits And Drawbacks Of Single-tenant Cloud Architecture

The benefits associated with single-tenant cloud architecture include:

  • Data security - Each customer’s data is isolated, minimizing the risk of a data breach that affects multiple customers.
  • Customization - More customization options are available in a single-tenant system compared to a multi-tenant system because each customer has dedicated software and hardware.
  • Portability - It can also be easier to migrate data from a single-tenant architecture. The most obvious reason is that there is simply less data to handle compared to a multi-tenant setup. Also, since the data store contains only data for a single customer, the team has less worry about complicated migration scripts and mixing customer data on migration. Lastly, most single-tenant architecture replicate the same infrastructure for each customer; therefore, migrating data is often similar to setting up a new customer..

Some disadvantages of single-tenant cloud architecture are:

  • Complex setup and management - You have to deploy an instance and set up a database for each customer. As the clientele grows, it becomes more difficult to manage multiple applications. Single-tenant architecture is particularly unsuitable for small startup teams.
  • High costs - Running a single-tenant set-up is more expensive than using shared resources. If every customer had their own database and compute, you would need a lot of resources to manage it.
  • Inefficient resource usage - Resources are also likely to be underutilized, leading to inefficiencies. Since customers do not have the same usage patterns, allocating the same amount of physical resources to each customer will result in some customers using all (or even needing more) of their allocated resources while others use little or none of their resources.

Benefits And Drawbacks Of Multi-tenant Cloud Architecture

Some of the benefits associated with multi-tenant cloud architecture are:

  • Easy deployability - Consider a team of two people building a new startup. It would be too much work for a team of two to serve multiple clients using a single-tenant approach. While it is doable, it will require a lot of effort. If they adopt a multi-tenant system, however, they can reach for tools provided by the cloud services provider, such as AWS, and build their application faster. Multi-tenancy is at the heart of effective SaaS operations because it makes it easy to build and deploy applications faster and to scale those applications quickly.
  • Efficient resource usage - Unlike the single-tenant model where resources are likely to be underutilized, available resources in a multi-tenant environment are used maximally because they are shared by multiple users.
  • Reduced costs - Multiple customers share the cost of the environment in multi-tenancy, so the application is cheaper to build and maintain. Maintenance and management costs are shared by all customers. For example, a single DynamoDB Table can easily hold all application data for millions of customers (as is the case with Amazon itself).

While multi-tenant cloud architecture is usually the best approach for most consumer-facing applications, it is not without its disadvantages, which include:

  • Greater security risk - In a multi-tenant system, the risks are higher because resources are shared by multiple customers. If one customer’s data is compromised, it is more likely that it will affect other customers, unlike in a single-tenant cloud where security incidents are isolated to a single client.
  • Lack of cost visibility - In comparison to a single-tenant system where each customer has their own database, it is much harder to separate costs in the multi-tenant system.

When To Use Single-tenant Vs. Multi-tenant Architecture

A single tenant architecture may be suited for specific industries or sectors where there are strong privacy and security concerns around customer data. Good examples are the healthcare and finance industries.

In the healthcare industry, for example, applications must meet HIPAA requirements when dealing with patient information. So each hospital may need to have its own data center onsite to ensure compliance. The same applies to certain types of financial data.

Most consumer-facing applications are best built as multi-tenant applications. The cloud itself is multi-tenant. Cloud service providers such as AWS use the same hardware for various customers under the covers. While each customer has a different Amazon account, the same computers process customer information.

Understanding Cost Per Customer In A Multi-Tenant Architecture

One of the major trade-offs with multi-tenancy is cost visibility. Since all your customer data is housed in one database, it’s difficult to figure out the cost of servicing each customer individually.

A lack of visibility into your costs per tenant (i.e., per customer) makes it difficult to make critical pricing decisions because you have no idea what your costs and margins are for each customer or customer segment.

So, how do you tease apart your multi-tenant architecture to understand your costs per tenant? This is where CloudZero comes in.

CloudZero’s cloud cost intelligence platform lets you have the best of both worlds when managing customer data in a multi-tenant environment. You do not have to manage all your customers separately but you can still decipher your cost per customer.

Cost per tenant

CloudZero automatically allocates cost per tenant and delivers granular metrics for your SaaS business. CloudZero pulls in your AWS events, normalizes the data, and allows you to correlate cost with other types of metrics.

Request a demo to see how CloudZero helps you break down costs in a multi-tenant architecture, giving you the insight you need to run your business better.


Join thousands of engineers who already receive the best AWS and cloud cost intelligence content.